User talk:Multichill
Add topic
Follow up on US PD SDC by CuratorBot
[edit]Hi. From User talk:DaxServer/Archive 2#CuratorBot adding incorrect copyright statements, I've applied the fix to the bot and running the fixes atm. Thanks! -- DaxServer (talk) 15:32, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
- @DaxServer: thanks for picking this up. Multichill (talk) 21:18, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Bot adding data with future dates
[edit]Hi. This File:Murales-valencia garage.jpg image was uploaded on March 10 2024. The next day, March 11 2024, Multichill bot added structured data, including a date 22 March 2024, that had not yet come https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AMurales-valencia_garage.jpg&diff=859489766&oldid=859439830 . Obviusly, regardless of the Exif data, which depend on the settings of the camera or device with which the file was created, a file can't be created after its upload. Shouldn't bots refrain to add future dates, or, at least, add a warning when Exif data are seen to be incorrect? Javier ME (talk) 08:20, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Javierme: the bot just extracts it from the wikitext. Upload date and exif are not used. The only checks if it's a valid date (if the Wikibase API is able to parse it). It was uploaded with the upload wizard, that should probably throw a warning about the data being in the future. Multichill (talk) 09:21, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Geographicus files
[edit]Hi, A lot of files were uploaded from Geographicus with incomplete license (only PD-Art), e.g. File:1884 Bradley Map of Montana, Wyoming and Idaho - Geographicus - MTWYID-bradley-1884.jpg. Would it be possible to fix these? I have already fixed many manually, but it is a pain. Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:03, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Yann: back in the day (in 2011) we just used {{PD-Art}}. Updating that is quite tricky. Not sure if this can be automated. Multichill (talk) 09:48, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Omphalographer (talk) 18:18, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
JayCubby (talk) 23:56, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
File:British (English) School - Sir John Norris (1547^–1597) - 129774 - National Trust.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Abzeronow (talk) 00:04, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Juiste sjabloon
[edit]Hoi Multichill,
Ik was wat bestanden uit het Stadsarchief Rotterdam aan het nalopen, en veel van hun bestanden zijn geupload als CC-0 waar ze eigenlijk als PD-old gelicenseerd moeten zijn, zoals bijvoorbeeld File:1920 Portret van mr. Wynand Adriaan Mees, kassier en makelaar in assurantiën.jpg. Ik worstel even met het juiste sjabloon: als ik {{PD-old}} gebruik zegt het sjabloon dat ik ook de licentie voor de VS toe moet voegen, en gebruik ik {{PD-old-expired}} dan zegt hij dat het bestand is gepubliceerd in de VS voor 1930. Het Stadsarchief Rotterdam heeft een mix van bestanden beschikbaar onder PD, deels omdat de fotograaf overleden is, deels omdat de (onbekende) fotograaf bij een van de plaatselijke kranten werkte en de afbeelding meer dan 70 jaar geleden is gepubliceerd. Welk licentiesjabloon kan ik daar het beste voor gebruiken? Ciell (talk) 12:54, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Hallo Ciell, misschien is dit sjabloon geschikt? {{PD-old-auto-1996}}. Ik zag dat zij Public Domain Mark 1.0 Universeel gebruiken in Rotterdam. Groet Peli (talk) 11:52, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hey @Pelikana, bedankt voor het meedenken. PD vanwege ouderdom is in ieder geval correct: ik worstel met wat er *in* onze sjablonen hier staat. {{PD-old-70-expired}} lijkt een duo-sjabloon die twee verschillende situaties dekt: zowel alle landen met PD wetgeving voor 70 jaar of minder na het overlijden van de maker, alsook (en? of? en/of? geen idee wat het werkelijk betekent!) foto's die in de USA in het PD gekomen zijn vóór January 1, 1930. Dat is toch verwarrend...?
- Die welke jij voorstelt, {{PD-old-auto-1996}}, stelt in voorwaarde #3 dat de afbeelding met dat sjabloon gepubliceerd is in het eigen land voor 1926 (opmerking 3, URAA = 1996-70 jaar = foto was al in het publiek domein in 1926.). Dat is in dit geval ook niet van toepassing, meen ik - de afbeeldingen uit het Rotterdams Archief zijn uit de jaren 1930 en 1940.
- Het kan ook aan mij liggen hoor, maar ik zit hier echt even in de knoop.
Ciell (talk) 13:22, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
File:G.A.C. Smith - Pot met hyacinten - R13570 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg
[edit]![]() |
File:G.A.C. Smith - Pot met hyacinten - R13570 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nutshinou Talk! 09:39, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
File:J.S. van der Stok - Stilleven met eieren - XN2445 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg
[edit]![]() |
File:J.S. van der Stok - Stilleven met eieren - XN2445 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nutshinou Talk! 09:41, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
File:L.A. Adriaans - Zwart - Blokken - Tw. in blauw - BK48810 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg
[edit]![]() |
File:L.A. Adriaans - Zwart - Blokken - Tw. in blauw - BK48810 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nutshinou Talk! 09:42, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
File:A.F.E. van Rossum - P.V. structuur op dubbel stramien - BK3280 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg
[edit]![]() |
File:A.F.E. van Rossum - P.V. structuur op dubbel stramien - BK3280 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nutshinou Talk! 09:46, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
File:G. Bartey - Anemonen - XN1668 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg
[edit]![]() |
File:G. Bartey - Anemonen - XN1668 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nutshinou Talk! 09:48, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
File:Zwaantina Theodora Johanna Hiethaar - Het dienstmeisje - BK97175 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg
[edit]![]() |
File:Zwaantina Theodora Johanna Hiethaar - Het dienstmeisje - BK97175 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nutshinou Talk! 09:48, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
File:A.J. Leemhuis - Ruit I - BK66805-A - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg
[edit]![]() |
File:A.J. Leemhuis - Ruit I - BK66805-A - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nutshinou Talk! 09:49, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
File:G. van Bakel - Autaar - BK21591 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg
[edit]![]() |
File:G. van Bakel - Autaar - BK21591 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nutshinou Talk! 09:50, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Onbekend - - - XN1506 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nutshinou Talk! 09:56, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Onbekend - - - XN1942 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nutshinou Talk! 09:56, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
File:Monogrammist D.F. - Gezicht op het Palazzo Ducale in Venetië - R62 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg
[edit]![]() |
File:Monogrammist D.F. - Gezicht op het Palazzo Ducale in Venetië - R62 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nutshinou Talk! 13:06, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
File:Onbekend - Portret van een man - C2208 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg
[edit]![]() |
File:Onbekend - Portret van een man - C2208 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nutshinou Talk! 13:09, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
File:Onbekend - Diana en Actaeon - C681 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg
[edit]![]() |
File:Onbekend - Diana en Actaeon - C681 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nutshinou Talk! 13:09, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
File:Onbekend - Portret van een vrouw - C2209 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg
[edit]![]() |
File:Onbekend - Portret van een vrouw - C2209 - Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands Art Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nutshinou Talk! 13:09, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Adding SDC by BotMultichillT
[edit]Hello @Multichill, While adding structured data to the uploaded media files, could you please add the Wikidata item of the creator if it is available, instead of using the somevalue placeholder? ❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 16:11, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
iNaturalist2Commons
[edit]Hoi Multichill, Kan je misschien helpen met dit issue? Ik zag je naam namelijk staan als interface admin.
Het gaat om het editten van deze pagina. Met deze inhoud Het zou dan deze diff moeten opleveren. groetjes,
Rudolphous (talk) 19:05, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- Je zou de pagina ook kunnen wijzingen in:
- // Forwarding this script to load the maintained version from User:Rudolphous
- mw.loader.load('//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Rudolphous/inat2commons.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript');
- Dan host ik de file vanaf nu.
- Rudolphous (talk) 20:07, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Francesco Guardi - Santa Maria della Salute - 2015.19.29 - Corcoran Gallery of Art.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Oursana (talk) 01:48, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Old Danish maps
[edit]Hi! If you have a little time you are very welcome to read and comment at Commons:Batch uploading/historiskekort.dk. I have tried my first batch upload and would appriciate it if you could tell me if I'm on the right track. MGA73 (talk) 20:28, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Unknown artist - Andrea Mantegna (c.1431–1506) - NG2250 - National Gallery.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Howardcorn33 (talk) 05:40, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
Norfolk, England has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Enyavar (talk) 19:11, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Category:Bernadette Schugg
[edit]Hallo Multichill, ich glaube, ich habe heute ein großes Durcheinander fabriziert, als ich eigentlich nur die Category:Bernadette Schugg erstellen wollte. Nun gibt es zwei: Bernadette Schugg und Category:Bernadette Schugg. Kann man dieses Problem geheben? Oder soll ich beide löschen und neu anfangen? (Der Fotograf ist benachrichtigt und schickt in Kürze seine Lizenzfreigabe.) Pacsolis (talk) 14:36, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi Multichill, jouw bot makte een verkeerde combinatie van inventarnummer van het Mauritshuis met Rijksmuseum. Ik heb het corrigeert. Misschien kan je jouw bot voor het allgemeen corrigieren, als die dat nog steeds doet. Oursana (talk) 13:51, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Józef Chełmoński - Whipper-in - MP 4866 MNW - National Museum in Warsaw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gower (talk) 15:51, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
Cali, Colombia July 2, 2025
Dear Sir or Madam Technical Support Department WIKIMEDIA COMMONS Email: info-commons@wikimedia.org
On July 1, 2025, I submitted the following request through my user account on the Wikimedia Commons platform:
Add category to approximately 374 uploaded files by user Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira
[edit]Hello. I have uploaded approximately 374 JPG image files between June 30 and July 1, 2025 under the user account User:Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira. These images belong to four research documents about Adolfo Aristizábal Llano and the Hotel Aristi (Cali, Colombia). I kindly request that a bot or administrator adds the following category to all approximately 374 files: Category:Adolfo_Aristizábal_Llano_and_Hotel_Aristi_Archives_(Cali,_Colombia) • Most of the files were uploaded between 2025-06-30 and 2025-07-01 • File types: .jpg only • Uploaded by: User:Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira • Language of filenames: name begins with 4 numbers (for example; the number of a year, like 2022), then a dash, followed by 3 numbers (for example; 001), then a dash followed by 3 numbers (for example; 155), then text in Spanish (some include references to Cali, Hotel Aristi, or Adolfo Aristizábal) • The user grants permission for categorization by bot Thank you very much for your assistance. --Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira (talk) 22:17, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
I would appreciate it if you could kindly confirm whether this request has been properly received by your technical team, and provide an estimated date by which it may be processed.
Sincerely, Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira Mobile: +57 315 551 7078 Email 1: jaristialvira@gmail.com Email 2: jaristialvira@outlook.com
HOTEL ARISTI-FUNDADOR ADOLFO ARISTIZABAL LLANO-INFORMATION-PHOTOS-FILES-CATEGORY ADDITION-WIKIMEDIA COMMONS-JUL 1 2025
[edit]Cali, Colombia July 2, 2025
Dear Sir or Madam
Technical Support Department WIKIMEDIA COMMONS Email: info-commons@wikimedia.org
On July 1, 2025, I submitted the following request through my user account on the Wikimedia Commons platform:
Add category to approximately 374 uploaded files by user Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira
[edit]Hello. I have uploaded approximately 374 JPG image files between June 30 and July 1, 2025 under the user account User:Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira.
These images belong to four research documents about Adolfo Aristizábal Llano and the Hotel Aristi (Cali, Colombia). I kindly request that a bot or administrator adds the following category to all approximately 374 files: Category:Adolfo_Aristizábal_Llano_and_Hotel_Aristi_Archives_(Cali,_Colombia) Most of the files were uploaded between 2025-06-30 and 2025-07-01 File types: .jpg only Uploaded by: User:Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira Language of filenames: name begins with 4 numbers (for example; the number of a year, like 2022), then a dash, followed by 3 numbers (for example; 001), then a dash followed by 3 numbers (for example; 155), then text in Spanish (some include references to Cali, Hotel Aristi, or Adolfo Aristizábal) The user grants permission for categorization by bot Thank you very much for your assistance.
--Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira (talk) 22:19, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
I would appreciate it if you could kindly confirm whether this request has been properly received by your technical team, and provide an estimated date by which it may be processed.
Sincerely,
Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira Mobile: +57 315 551 7078 Email 1: jaristialvira@gmail.com Email 2: jaristialvira@outlook.com Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira (talk) 22:19, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Looks like 999real already did the requested categorization, but at least some images are incorrectly tagged as having been created by Jorge Alberto Aristizábal Alvira — f.i. thisphoto. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:08, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your time and effort on our behalf. How may I see the photo you have mentioned? 2800:484:807D:1400:DD03:CABA:8734:C3E1 17:44, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
Category:Images_from_the_Rijksdienst_voor_het_Cultureel_Erfgoed_higher_resolution_available has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Vysotsky (talk) 22:14, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
Category:Images_from_RCE_by_subject_not_ready_to_substitute has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Vysotsky (talk) 22:15, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Hoe krijg ik Camera location automatisch bij mijn fotos ?
[edit]Ik wil bij een flink aantal fotos graag dat ze op OpenStreetMap verschijnen en dat gaat via Camera Locaton denk ik. Vroeger ging dat automatisch. HOe krijg ik dat voorelkaar ? In de Metadata zit bijna altijd GPS informatie.
File:Neretva Rogotin Ploçe Podgradina 16 43 28 607000.jpeg
This bot runs daily on Wikimedia Commons and creates
Camera location | ![]() | View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMap | ![]() |
---|
templates using the data found in the EXIF headers of newly uploaded files. JakobHosp (talk) 20:59, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- @JakobHosp: I think User:DschwenBot used to do that. That bot broke down in 2022. I see several topics about that at User talk:Dschwen. I guess it was never replaced? That's a pity. Multichill (talk) 20:26, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- @JakobHosp: I guess this bot was no longer needed as the Upload Wizard add this based on the EXIF data. I don't know why your Wiki Uploader iOS application v. 1.2.3 does not add the location. Maybe you could consider using an other uplaod method, like Upload Wizard. HenkvD (talk) 12:02, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Such a bot would still be useful. The Upload Wizzard adds coordinates based on EXIF but Wikishootme doesn't. Pere prlpz (talk) 12:42, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- I guess it should be two steps:
- Identify images that have coordinates in EXIF and tag these with {{GPS EXIF}}
- Extract GPS from EXIF, but it in structured data and replace {{GPS EXIF}} with {{Location}}
- For finding images we'll probably need different strategies like monitoring recent changes and scanning a database dump.
- Mediawiki already extracts EXIF and exposes that in the API so should be possible to do this without having to download all images. Multichill (talk) 17:34, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- I guess it should be two steps:
- Works the Upload Wizard under Iphone SE2022 ? V1.2.3 works so nice as it remembers which photos are already uploaded. And i just dont get it becasue on WikiMap - Media with GPS EXIF the photos are nice on the map. Is it possible to extrat the GPS data from this map ? The main problem is i get the data in Mintues and seconds in stead of decimals JakobHosp (talk) 19:43, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- I see that in the API the GPS coordinates are decimal. That is excellent as LOCATION needs that. Now it is may be less work than i thought, but autmatically will be less error prone and less work.
- { "name": "GPSLatitude", "value": 43.50926944444444 }, { "name": "GPSLongitude", "value": 16.43755277777778 }, JakobHosp (talk) 19:51, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- @JakobHosp: made a quick proof of concept to tag files. That seems to work.
- Next step is to extract the coordinates. I recall that being a bit more tricky because we also might need to add the heading. Multichill (talk) 21:51, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the work. Would be very nice if it would work again. JakobHosp (talk) 08:16, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Agree, I also hope that the bot that reads the coordinates from the EXIF files can work again. GioviPen GP msg 17:21, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the work. Would be very nice if it would work again. JakobHosp (talk) 08:16, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- Such a bot would still be useful. The Upload Wizzard adds coordinates based on EXIF but Wikishootme doesn't. Pere prlpz (talk) 12:42, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- @JakobHosp: I guess this bot was no longer needed as the Upload Wizard add this based on the EXIF data. I don't know why your Wiki Uploader iOS application v. 1.2.3 does not add the location. Maybe you could consider using an other uplaod method, like Upload Wizard. HenkvD (talk) 12:02, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- It is not possible to use parts of the DSchwenBot to get it to work again ? I will try to use the upload wizard as that seems the advice. My iphone SE dropped in to the toilet and it is definitely NOT waterproof as the specifications say. JakobHosp (talk) 07:26, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- @JakobHosp: probably, but someone else was already working on it, see User_talk:Rkieferbaum#Category:Media_with_GPS_EXIF. For now I just focus on finding the files so the other bot can do the actual extraction.
- Sorry to hear about your phone. I hope you were able to recover at least your data. Multichill (talk) 09:56, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
0,0 coords
[edit]if your bot can tell that the coords are very close to 0,0 like File:(20240727) Nederland 03.jpg it should add {{GPS EXIF ambiguous}} instead. RoyZuo (talk) 17:33, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- Would be even better if you don't add invalid coordinates in the EXIF. First step is to tag with {{GPS EXIF}}. Some bot will later replace it with {{GPS EXIF ambiguous}}. Multichill (talk) 08:19, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- it comes with cameras, when they sometimes malfunction, not what i or most lay users can control or pay attention to. duh? RoyZuo (talk) 18:42, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- It's also common with files from GLAM sources (example I just noted). It would be best if files with 0,0 coordinates could be tagged with {{GPS EXIF ambiguous}} with one bot run rather than multiple. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:45, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Agree with @Pi.1415926535. GioviPen GP msg 17:18, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- It's also common with files from GLAM sources (example I just noted). It would be best if files with 0,0 coordinates could be tagged with {{GPS EXIF ambiguous}} with one bot run rather than multiple. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:45, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- it comes with cameras, when they sometimes malfunction, not what i or most lay users can control or pay attention to. duh? RoyZuo (talk) 18:42, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Category:Source categories (flat list)
[edit]still 143 pages which i dont think belong there, since 2023. RoyZuo (talk) 18:45, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Richard Smith (1931-2016) - Key Ring - B2001.10 - Yale Center for British Art.jpg
- File:Richard Smith (1931-2016) - Painting - T01588 - Tate.jpg
- File:Richard Smith (1931-2016) - Panatella - T01199 - Tate.jpg
Yours sincerely, Nutshinou Talk! 16:35, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Richard Smith (1931-2016) - Mandarino - T01807 - Tate.jpg
- File:Richard Smith (1931-2016) - The Typographer - T04886 - Tate.jpg
- File:Richard Smith (1931-2016) - Triangular - T03115 - Tate.jpg
- File:Richard Smith (1931-2016) - Vista - T00855 - Tate.jpg
Yours sincerely, Nutshinou Talk! 16:36, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
GPS EXIF should not be added when location withheld
[edit]{{GPS EXIF}} should probably not be added if an image is in Category:Location withheld. Sam Wilson 06:04, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- Probably? Currently an empty set. Your remark seems to be missing some context. Multichill (talk) 08:47, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Multichill: Sorry, I was sort of trying to avoid linking directly to them, but it doesn't really matter. :) These two (incorrectly; I'll fix that) don't use the template: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=File%3A+incategory%3ALocation_withheld+hastemplate%3AGPS_EXIF&title=Special%3AMediaSearch&type=image (although they should, and their coords should also be removed from the Exif I guess). Sam Wilson 10:28, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Samwilson: ah, some files not using the template. Switched these and some other files to use {{Location withheld}} and added {{Image template notice}} to the category. That should keep the bots away. Multichill (talk) 20:05, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Multichill: Looks good, thanks! Sam Wilson 00:14, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Samwilson: ah, some files not using the template. Switched these and some other files to use {{Location withheld}} and added {{Image template notice}} to the category. That should keep the bots away. Multichill (talk) 20:05, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Multichill: Sorry, I was sort of trying to avoid linking directly to them, but it doesn't really matter. :) These two (incorrectly; I'll fix that) don't use the template: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=File%3A+incategory%3ALocation_withheld+hastemplate%3AGPS_EXIF&title=Special%3AMediaSearch&type=image (although they should, and their coords should also be removed from the Exif I guess). Sam Wilson 10:28, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
BotMultichillT
[edit]Hello! Could i convince you to get your bot to add cosplay of (P13593) and Facebook image ID (P13654) to files? I have an idea as to how the bot could detect the correct items and values to use Trade (talk) 00:06, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Weirdly read coordinates
[edit]Hello,
what happened here: Special:Diff/1065362490/1065387312? As far as I can tell, the EXIF in File:Nebelung-Katze in Kratzbaumhöhle.jpg show other data than those that your bot wrote. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 07:08, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Grand-Duc: you should ask the uploader why the EXIF is different than the wikitext. The bot doesn't use the exif at all, it uses the wikitext and that contains {{Location|-80|115.773353|heading:306.95989974937345}}. Multichill (talk) 08:27, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, I thought that your bot read the location data from the EXIF. I know that there's this kind of tool around, as I happened to upload photos with locations in EXIF where a bot (don't recall its name, though) came and put them into the description. I removed the erroneous data in {{Location}} - they pointed to the Antarctic, that's obviously senseless. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 08:52, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Grand-Duc: no, only wikitext. The bot that was extracting it from EXIF broke down. I've started tagging files with {{GPS EXIF}} (filling up Category:Media with GPS EXIF) to get the missing coordinates added. See also several previous topics. Multichill (talk) 09:03, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, indeed. Thanks for the explanation! :-) Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 09:05, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Grand-Duc: no, only wikitext. The bot that was extracting it from EXIF broke down. I've started tagging files with {{GPS EXIF}} (filling up Category:Media with GPS EXIF) to get the missing coordinates added. See also several previous topics. Multichill (talk) 09:03, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, I thought that your bot read the location data from the EXIF. I know that there's this kind of tool around, as I happened to upload photos with locations in EXIF where a bot (don't recall its name, though) came and put them into the description. I removed the erroneous data in {{Location}} - they pointed to the Antarctic, that's obviously senseless. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 08:52, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
hello, writing here to avoid another topic since is related. can I ask you why your bot (that was extracting coordinates from EXIF) broke down? is there a way to implement it again? can I do it somehow (ofc not manually as I did for some of my files)? now in that category there are more than 300k files and it's still increasing... GioviPen GP msg 17:16, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- @GiovanniPen: My bot didn't break down. User:DschwenBot broke down, see User_talk:Dschwen#'GPS_EXIF'-tagged_images_haven't_been_processed_for_>24_hrs.
- We had three years of backlog and my bot finished tagging those with {{GPS EXIF}} so I don't think it will increase a lot. The last ones are in Category:GPS EXIF candidates (review needed).
- I just focused on first getting these files tagged, next step is to extract coordinates, see also User_talk:Rkieferbaum#Category:Media_with_GPS_EXIF. Multichill (talk) 21:06, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- oh ok ty. was that one the only one doing the location job (besides Rkieferbaum's one)? GioviPen GP msg 17:04, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:James Cumming (1922-1991) - Garynahine Women - GMA 1033 - National Galleries of Scotland.jpg
- File:James Cumming (1922-1991) - Galloway Crofter - GMA 1034 - National Galleries of Scotland.jpg
Yours sincerely, Nutshinou (talk) 23:29, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Nutshinou (talk) 23:29, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
File:Adrien Sénéchal - Notre Dame de Reims, La Chapelle Absidiale - P11n4 - Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum.jpg
[edit]![]() |
File:Adrien Sénéchal - Notre Dame de Reims, La Chapelle Absidiale - P11n4 - Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |